How Many Practice Area Pages Does Your Law Firm Actually Need?

"How many practice area pages do we actually need?" is a common early question in site planning, and there's no single universal number that applies to every firm. Understanding the right practice area page structure for a specific firm means working through a few genuine considerations, rather than defaulting to either an overly minimal single combined page or an unnecessarily exhaustive list of pages for every conceivable sub-topic.

Start With Actual Case Volume

The most fundamental consideration is which practice areas and sub-areas the firm actually handles regularly. Building a dedicated, in-depth page for a niche sub-area the firm handles only rarely represents a content investment that's unlikely to justify itself, both because the resulting page won't reflect deep, genuine expertise, and because the resulting leads (if the page does perform) may not align well with what the firm actually wants to prioritize handling.

Layer in Real Search Opportunity

Beyond case volume alone, genuine search volume and competition for a given sub-area in the firm's specific market should factor into prioritization. A sub-area the firm handles occasionally, but which represents significant, achievable search opportunity locally, may still be worth a dedicated page. Conversely, a sub-area the firm handles somewhat more often, but which represents minimal search volume or extremely difficult competition in a specific market, might reasonably be covered within a broader hub page rather than warranting its own dedicated content investment.

The Hub-and-Sub-Page Framework

A practical starting framework: each broad practice area category the firm handles (Family Law, Personal Injury, Immigration) gets its own hub page, providing a genuine overview and directly linking to more specific sub-area pages beneath it. Sub-areas representing meaningful search volume and genuine, regular case handling get their own dedicated pages (within Family Law: divorce, custody, child support; within Personal Injury: car accidents, slip and fall, wrongful death). Sub-areas that are more marginal — lower search volume, less frequently handled — can reasonably be addressed within the broader hub page itself, without necessarily requiring a fully dedicated page from the outset.

Why Fewer, Thorough Pages Outperform More, Thinner Pages

It's tempting to build out as many pages as possible, reasoning that more pages mean more opportunities to rank for more search terms. In practice, a smaller number of genuinely thorough, well-researched pages tends to outperform a larger number of thin, underdeveloped pages, both because search engines reward genuine depth and topical authority over sheer page count, and because thin pages provide less real value to visitors, potentially hurting engagement and conversion even on the pages that do exist. If content resources are genuinely limited, it's usually better to build fewer pages well than more pages poorly.

Structure Isn't Fixed Forever

The right practice area page structure for a firm today isn't necessarily the right structure indefinitely. As a firm's practice grows — adding new practice areas, expanding case volume in a previously minor sub-area — the site structure should expand accordingly. Similarly, a sub-area initially covered only briefly within a broader hub page, because content resources were limited at launch, can be expanded into its own dedicated page later as resources allow, without requiring a full site rebuild to accommodate that expansion, provided the underlying architecture was built with this kind of future growth in mind from the start.

Signs Your Current Structure May Need Adjustment

• A hub page that's grown unwieldy, trying to cover too many sub-areas briefly within a single page — often a sign that at least the higher-volume sub-areas covered there deserve their own dedicated pages
• Strong search performance for a specific sub-topic currently only briefly addressed, suggesting real opportunity for a more dedicated page
• New practice areas the firm has begun handling that aren't yet reflected anywhere in the site's structure at all
• Very low performance on a dedicated page for a sub-area the firm rarely actually handles, suggesting that content investment might be better redirected elsewhere

A Practical Process for Determining Your Own Structure

1. List every practice area and genuine sub-area the firm actually handles with meaningful regularity
2. Research search volume and competition for each, specific to the firm's actual market
3. Prioritize dedicated pages for the intersection of genuine case volume and real search opportunity
4. Group lower-priority sub-areas within broader hub page content initially, with room to expand later
5. Revisit this structure periodically as the firm's practice and content resources evolve

The Bottom Line

The right number of practice area pages isn't a fixed target — it's the result of matching genuine case volume and real search opportunity against realistic content production capacity, prioritizing depth and quality over an arbitrary page count, with room to expand the structure deliberately over time as the firm and its content resources grow.

Planning the right practice area structure for your specific firm? Our law firm website design process starts by mapping this out based on your actual practice, not a generic template. Get a Free Website Audit →

← All posts